Plastic or pine: Which Christmas tree is better for the planet?
Photo: Jennifer Gauthier / The Record
December 13, 2024
Dr. Kai Chan, a professor at the Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability, and Dr. Johan Foster, a professor in the Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, weighed in on the debate between choosing a plastic or real Christmas tree. According to Dr. Chan, while the environmental impact of your holiday tree matters, it is part of a much larger issue of overconsumption during the season. “Ultimately, the amount of attention this gets is just way more than it merits in the face of the magnitude of the problem we’re facing,” he explained, emphasizing the importance of rethinking holiday traditions to reduce overall consumption. Dr. Foster echoed this sentiment, stating, “There’s not an easy answer,” but stressed that keeping a plastic tree for decades or choosing a local and sustainably disposed real tree can significantly reduce your carbon footprint.
When it comes to choosing the most sustainable option, both professors agree that small decisions can add up. Dr. Foster recommends extending the life of artificial trees by keeping them for 10 to 20 years, ensuring they stay out of the sun to prevent plastic degradation. For those who opt for natural trees, proper recycling, such as tree chipping, is key. “I prefer a live tree,” Foster shared, recalling his childhood in McBride, B.C., where his family would collect trees from nearby forests. Ultimately, whether you choose plastic, natural, or even a rented potted tree, Dr. Chan suggests that it’s about adopting mindful, low-impact traditions that align with your values while helping to protect the planet.